Globalization and the Rise of Inequality
January 20, 2007
The extremes of wealth and poverty threaten globalisation. North American companies lose jobs to the Chinese Special Economic Zone (SEZ) where factories often employ rural women to work in 19th century conditions to keep their costs low. Meanwhile the total pay of top managers in North America has increased from 1986 through 2006 to roughly 40 times the average and from 1966 to 110 times the average.
Globalization “refers to the current transformation of the world economy the reduction of national barriers to trade and investment, the expansion of telecommunications and information systems, the growth of off-shore financial markets, the increasing role of multinational enterprises, the explosion of mergers and acquisitions, global inter-firm networking arrangements and alliances, regional economic integration and the development of a single unified global market. The phenomenon of globalization is accompanied by increasing international mobility, the migration of workers, the growth of tourism and the increasing ease of international travel (Leary 1998:265).”
Selected Bibliography and Webliography
Leary, Virginia A. 1998. “Globalization and Human Rights.” In Symonides, Janusz (Ed.) Human Rights: New Dimensions and Challenges: Manual on Human Rights. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Dartmouth Publishing Company Ltd. / UNESCO Publishing. pp. 265-276.
2007. “Rich man, poor man.” The Economist. Jan 18th 2007. Accessed January 18, 2007.
Filed in how to be poor in a rich country, OECD, Political Philosophy, Public Policy, Risk Management, Risk Society, social exclusion, Social Justice, vulnerability to social exclusion, wealth disparities in OECD
Tags: Canadian Policy Research Network, Deborah Barndt, digg, economic efficiency model, Ethical Topology of Self and the Other, Globalization on the Tomato Trail, how to be poor in a rich country, OECD, Policy Development, policy research, Risk Management, social exclusion, The Economist, thinking press vs mass media